Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Tolerance of Injustice and the Gospel

This morning I was listening to some hymns on a CD and one hymn reminded me of the Civil Rights movement.  It has been forgotten by the politically correct that the Civil Rights movement and the abolitionists of slavery had a foundation in Christianity.  Those who were at the forefront of these efforts openly proclaimed the name of Christ and His teachings.  With that in mind however, I thought that it is amazing that the gospel spread to African Americans in this country when there was so much hypocrisy abounding.  When slavery was legal, the institutional church was silent at best and pro-slavery at worst.  This can be seen in the writings of such people as William Loyd Garrison and Frederick Douglass.  

Why was the institutional church silent or pro-slavery?  Because it was not politically correct to be openly opposed to slavery. It was devisive.  You might offend some of your church members who were slave owners and depended upon it for their livliehood.  And besides that, the black man's humanity was in doubt so who was to say whether slavery was right or wrong.  One might believe the black man was fully human as a white man.  While some thought it was not so.  But who were they to force their view on somebody. Each person would have to make up his own mind.  In the mean time, let's get about our business of "worshipping" God.

 

It is sickening to think about really.  Yet are we not at that same point today?  The humanity of the pre-born child and the inhumanity of abortion that kills that child is in debate today.  And sadly, the institutional church has for the most part been a non-player.

 

How much moral authority can the church have when she tolerates something as evil as killing a baby?  How convincing is the message of the love of Jesus when those bringing that message are either complicit in the deaths of babies or complacent about the killing going on around them?  

 

More to follow... 

 

DEC 

Tuesday, June 5, 2007

Why Do YOU Oppose Abortion Mr. Guiliani?

Recently CNN quoted former New York City Mayor Rudy Guiliani: 

“Religion is an important thing to me and my life, but ultimately I’ve been in public life most of my life, and taken oaths of office to enforce the law, and I’ve got to make the decisions that I think are the right ones in a country like ours,” he said.

“My view on abortion is that it’s wrong but that ultimately, government should not be enforcing that decision on a woman.”

Now what's wrong with this statement? A simple question can quickly point out that this is a barbaric view.  That question is, "Why do you think abortion is wrong Mr. Guiliani?"  To which his reply would most likely be, "Well I think abortion kills a human being. I think abortion kills a baby." To which you repeat back what he has just said. "So Mr. Guiliani, you think that abortion kills a baby? But you think that people should be allowed to decide to kill babies?"

You see Mr. Guiliani.  You don't really believe abortion kills a baby.  You don't really believe abortion is wrong.

javascript:void(0)